But they are two obstacles that weren’t in place last time. But that’s going to be a lot easier, now that they can accurately say that a judge ruled the city broke state law in pursuit of the measure last time.Īn older and more conservative electorate, and the specter of wrongdoing by the city two years ago, still might not be enough to push the measure below 50 percent. Opponents will be ready with new arguments: “The problem they’re going to be fighting in general is skepticism about whether the city is rushing this or not,” said Shepard.Īnd, opponents of Measure E in 2020 hardly mustered an argument. So, it’s not 2010 or 2014 anymore, but the electorate this year is still likely to be somewhat to the right of the one that approved Measure E in 2020. That’s become less true in a hurry, culminating in 2018 when they unseated multiple incumbent Republicans, and progressive challengers did the same to incumbent Democrats who were to their right. Not too long ago, Democrats in San Diego largely accepted that the fundamentals worked against them in off-year elections. Turnout is likely to be lower in 2022 than it was in 2024, and the people less likely to vote are likely to come from groups that are more likely to support the measure: younger people, people of color, renters, people with lower incomes, people who don’t live on the coast. That’s a nice cushion, but there are a couple reasons to wonder if the question could have a tougher redo. It’s unclear whether the City Council will agree with staff to do that, though.Ī different electorate: Measure E passed comfortably, with over 56 percent of the vote. The city does plan to try to eliminate two of the five bidders this month. They wanted to know what they were getting.”

People didn’t want to vote on a pig in the poke. “It’s why we worked so hard to have a plan for the SDSU West project. “In general, it’s harder to sell a concept than a specific project, said Tom Shepard, the veteran political consultant who led the campaign for thr SDSU West ballot measure. With no winner chosen by the time of the vote, the city wouldn’t have a partner like this helping the campaign. Last time around, Brookfield Properties won the bidding and then helped fund the campaign. We won’t be asking that, or using it as a consideration in our selection.”

“But no, we aren’t asking applicants to fund a ballot measure. “In terms of timing, if we go to Council in the spring and whittle our selection then or in the summer and make a selection in the fall, we would have plenty of time for that,” she said. Jessica Lawrence, the mayor’s director of policy, said earlier this year the city hadn’t decided yet to put the measure up in 2022 or 2024, but had plenty of time to choose a winner before a November election if it wanted. He could, theoretically, keep the competition open until the votes are in. It also meant the winning developer could fund the campaign. That meant voters had a vision of what they were voting on, whether positive or negative (even though the measure applied to the entire Midway community, not just the project area). It will be different: In 2020, Faulconer picked a Sports Arena developer well ahead of Election Day. This week, Councilman Chris Cate who had been the joint author of Measure E formally asked the City Council to put it on the ballot, again, in November. The city gambled that it wouldn’t need to do an environmental impact report on what Measure E would do or allow be done and opponents of the project sued and prevailed. “I took a lot of heat for authoring Measure E to pave the way for thousands of new affordable homes in the Midway/Sports Arena District, but I never backed down and we won,” she told the paper. What things? She cited only the redevelopment of Midway and specifically the Sports Arena land. She said her opponents in the race – Joel Day, Lori Saldaña and Mandy Havlik – have been speaking with a lot of bravado about what they would do on housing “but I actually got things done.” She acknowledged that costs were way too high and we needed to do more. DONATE NOWĪs part of their effort to interview all the candidates for local positions, the Union-Tribune’s editorial board asked Councilwoman Jen Campbell how she will combat the high cost of housing in San Diego. Thank you for supporting local journalism. Brews & News: Voice of San Diego Live Podcasts.Politics Report: The Midway Redo | Voice of San Diego Close

Awaken church san diego live stream